AON (Active Optical Network) and PON (Passive Optical Network) are two important fiber optic communication network architectures. This article will compare the differences between these two network architectures. We will first explain the basic architecture and working principle of AON, and explain its main features and advantages. Next, we will introduce the basic architecture and working principle of PON, and explain its main features and advantages.
Then, we will focus on comparing the differences between AON and PON in terms of network topology, network equipment composition, transmission media, optical path distribution, power supply, and centralized management, and explain the impact of these differences on network construction and operation and maintenance. Finally, we will introduce the deployment of AON and PON in different application scenarios and analyze the reasons why the two networks are suitable for different needs.
Definition and characteristics of AON (Active Optical Network)
Basic architecture and working principle of AON:
AON (Active Optical Network) is a broadband access technology based on active optical network equipment. Unlike PON (passive optical network), the optical transmission path in AON network contains active devices, such as optical amplifiers, optical switches, etc.
The basic architecture of AON network includes:
(1) OLT (optical line terminal): located on the service provider side, providing network interface and service management functions.
(2) ODN (optical distribution network): an optical transmission network composed of optical fiber and active optical devices (such as amplifiers, switches, etc.).
(3) ONT (optical network terminal): located on the user side, providing photoelectric conversion and user access functions.
In AON network, OLT and ONT perform end-to-end optical transmission through active ODN. Active devices in ODN can provide functions such as amplification and scheduling of optical signals to support longer distances and larger-scale optical fiber coverage.
Main features and advantages of AON network:
(1) Higher transmission bandwidth and distance:
- AON network supports higher-speed optical transmission technologies, such as 10G-EPON, 10G-GPON, etc.
- Active optical devices can provide signal amplification, and the transmission distance can reach 40-60km.
(2) More flexible network topology:
- AON network can adopt a variety of flexible topologies such as star and ring.
- Through active optical switches and other devices, dynamic optical path switching and scheduling can be achieved.
(3) Stronger network reliability:
- Active devices in AON network can provide self-diagnosis and fault recovery functions.
- Through measures such as backup optical paths, the network’s disaster recovery capability is improved.
(4) Richer business support:
- AON networks can support more high-bandwidth services, such as 4K/8K video, cloud computing, etc.
- Active devices provide more flexible business carrying and QoS assurance capabilities.
(5) More intelligent management:
- Active devices in AON networks can provide richer management functions and data collection.
- Through a centralized management platform, intelligent monitoring and optimization of the entire network are achieved.
In general, AON networks have shown unique advantages in large-bandwidth applications and high-end user markets with their higher bandwidth, stronger reliability and more intelligent management.
Definition and characteristics of PON (Passive Optical Network)
Basic architecture and working principle of PON:
PON (Passive Optical Network) is a passive optical network, which is a broadband access technology based on optical fiber. The basic architecture of PON network includes the following key components:
(1) OLT (Optical Line Terminal): Deployed in the service provider’s computer room, responsible for network-side interface and service management functions.
(2) ODN (Optical Distribution Network): An optical transmission network composed of passive optical splitters, optical fibers, etc.
(3) ONU (Optical Network Unit): Deployed at the user site, realizing photoelectric conversion and user access functions.
The PON network adopts a tree topology. One OLT can support multiple ONUs, and the sharing of optical fiber resources is realized through passive optical splitters. The transmission method between OLT and ONU is uplink and downlink time division multiplexing (TDM).
Main features and advantages of PON network:
(1) Simple network architecture:
- The core equipment of PON network is only OLT and ONU, and ODN segment does not need active equipment.
- The simple passive optical network architecture greatly reduces the cost of network construction and maintenance.
(2) High bandwidth utilization:
- PON network uses shared optical transmission medium and improves bandwidth utilization efficiency through TDM.
- A single optical fiber can serve multiple users at the same time, saving optical fiber resources.
(3) Long transmission distance:
- Due to the use of optical fiber transmission, the transmission distance of PON network can reach more than 20km.
- The long-distance transmission characteristics greatly reduce the civil engineering cost of network construction.
(4) Strong service flexibility:
- PON network supports triple-play services (voice, video, data) to meet the diverse needs of users.
- ONU has multiple user interfaces, strong adaptability, and is easy to deploy flexibly.
(5) Low energy consumption:
- The passive optical network ODN part does not require power supply, which greatly reduces the operating energy consumption cost.
- ONU integrates power management function, and its energy consumption is much lower than that of traditional access equipment.
In short, the simple architecture, efficient bandwidth utilization, long-distance transmission and low cost of PON network make it the mainstream technology of current fiber access network.
Main differences between AON and PON networks
The main differences between AON (active optical network) and PON (passive optical network) are network architecture and cost. AON uses active devices for signal amplification and forwarding, which is suitable for scenarios that require high bandwidth and flexibility, but the cost is relatively high. PON uses a passive optical distribution network, which reduces maintenance and operating costs, is suitable for large-scale user access, and is commonly used in residential and commercial areas.
- Network topology:
- AON networks use flexible topologies such as star or ring, while PON networks use tree topology.
- The flexible topology of AON is conducive to meeting complex construction environments, but the management difficulty is also relatively high.
- The tree topology of PON is simple and easy to build, but the network scalability and disaster recovery capabilities are relatively weak.
- Network equipment composition:
- AON networks contain active equipment such as optical amplifiers and optical switches, while PON networks only have passive equipment.
- AON equipment is more expensive, but can provide stronger signal amplification and optical path scheduling capabilities.
- PON passive equipment has a lower cost, but the network scale is limited and the energy consumption is also lower.
- Transmission media:
- AON networks usually use single-mode optical fiber, while PON networks use more economical multi-mode optical fiber.
- Single-mode optical fiber can provide higher bandwidth and transmission distance, but it is more expensive.
- Optical path allocation:
- AON network uses point-to-point optical path allocation, and PON uses shared optical splitters.
- AON optical path allocation is flexible, but requires more optical fiber resources; PON optical path sharing can reduce optical fiber demand.
- AON can flexibly dispatch optical paths, and PON user access is restricted by the time division multiplexing mechanism.
- Power supply:
- Active devices in AON networks require external power supply, while passive devices in PON networks save power.
- AON networks have higher requirements for power supply reliability, while PON networks have lower power requirements.
- Centralized management:
- AON network can achieve more centralized and intelligent network management, while PON management is more decentralized.
- The centralized management mode of AON is conducive to network optimization and fault diagnosis, but it also increases the complexity of management.
In general, AON and PON networks have significant differences in topology, equipment composition, transmission performance, etc., and are suitable for different application scenarios. When planning the network, it is necessary to weigh the advantages and disadvantages of each according to specific needs and choose the appropriate solution.
Application scenarios of AON and PON networks
Application scenarios of AON networks:
(1) Large-bandwidth enterprise users:
- AON networks support higher transmission bandwidth and rate, which can meet the needs of enterprises for large-bandwidth services.
- Enterprise users usually require higher reliability and flexibility, and the advantages of AON networks can meet them.
(2) Metropolitan area network access:
- The star or ring topology of AON networks is suitable for metropolitan area network coverage, which can achieve wider network coverage.
- The metropolitan area network has higher requirements for service quality and reliability, and the performance advantages of AON networks are more prominent.
(3) Large communities and parks:
- AON networks can provide stronger optical path scheduling and service carrying capacity through active equipment.
- Large communities or parks have more complex requirements for bandwidth, service types, etc., and AON is more suitable.
Application scenarios of PON network:
(1) Home broadband access:
- The simple architecture and low cost of PON network are very suitable for the needs of home users.
- Home users have relatively low requirements for bandwidth and service types, which can be met by PON network.
(2) Small and medium-sized enterprise access:
- The cost advantage of PON network is suitable for the budget requirements of small and medium-sized enterprise users.
- Small and medium-sized enterprise users have higher requirements for bandwidth and service types than home users, but PON can still meet them.
(3) Rural/remote area coverage:
- The low cost and long-distance transmission characteristics of PON network are more suitable for network deployment in remote areas.
- Users in these areas have relatively simple needs and limited budgets, so PON networks have more cost advantages.
In general, AON networks are more suitable for enterprises and metropolitan area network users with large bandwidth and high demand, while PON networks are more suitable for households and small and medium-sized enterprise users, as well as remote rural areas. When planning the network, it is necessary to select the appropriate AON or PON solution based on factors such as user scenarios, business needs, and cost budgets.
Summary
AON and PON networks are two important architectures in the field of optical fiber communications, and they have their own advantages for different application needs. Our company has long been focusing on the research and development and application of AON and PON technologies and has rich practical experience. We provide various high-performance AON and PON equipment, including optical line terminals, optical network units, Ethernet switches, etc., which can meet the deployment needs of different application scenarios.
Our products use industry-leading technologies and have achieved excellent levels in reliability, energy efficiency, and management functions. At the same time, our engineering team will provide you with professional solution planning and implementation services to ensure that the selected network architecture performs optimally in actual applications. Contact us now to learn more.
